A Duality-Aware Calculus for Quantified Boolean Formulas

Wir präsentieren ein formales Rahmenwerk, das es ermöglicht das Verhalten von QBF-Beweisen zu beschreiben.Learning and backjumping are essential features in search-based decision procedures for Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF). To obtain a better understanding of such procedures, we present a formal framework, which allows to simultaneously reason on prenex conjunctive and disjunctive normal form. It captures both satisfying and falsifying search states in a symmetric way. This symmetry simplifies the framework and offers potential for further variants.W1255-N23S11408-N23(VLID)193237

A satisfiability procedure for quantified Boolean formulae

We present a satisfiability tester QSAT for quantified Boolean formulae and a restriction of QSAT to unquantified conjunctive normal form formulae. QSAT makes use of procedures which replace subformulae of a formula by equivalent formulae. By a sequence of such replacements, the original formula can be simplified to or . It may also be necessary to transform the original formula to generate a subformula to replace. eliminates collections of variables from an unquantified clause form formula until all variables have been eliminated. QSAT and can be applied to hardware verification and symbolic model checking. Results of an implementation of are described, as well as some complexity results for QSAT and . QSAT runs in linear time on a class of quantified Boolean formulae related to symbolic model checking. We present the class of “long and thin” unquantified formulae and give evidence that this class is common in applications. We also give theoretical and empirical evidence that is often faster than Davis and Putnam-type satisfiability checkers and ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs) on this class of formulae. We give an example where is exponentially faster than BDDs

Faster LRAT Checking Than Solving with CaDiCaL

DRAT is the standard proof format used in the SAT Competition. It is easy to generate but checking proofs often takes even more time than solving the problem. An alternative is to use the LRAT proof system. While LRAT is easier and way more efficient to check, it is more complex to generate directly. Due to this complexity LRAT is not supported natively by any state-of-the-art SAT solver. Therefore Carneiro and Heule proposed the mixed proof format FRAT which still suffers from costly intermediate translation. We present an extension to the state-of-the-art solver CaDiCaL which is able to generate LRAT natively for all procedures implemented in CaDiCaL. We further present Lrat-Trim, a tool which not only trims and checks LRAT proofs in both ASCII and binary format but also produces clausal cores and has been tested thoroughly. Our experiments on recent competition benchmarks show that our approach reduces time of proof generation and certification substantially compared to competing approaches using intermediate DRAT or FRAT proofs

CadiBack: Extracting Backbones with CaDiCaL

The backbone of a satisfiable formula is the set of literals that are true in all its satisfying assignments. Backbone computation can improve a wide range of SAT-based applications, such as verification, fault localization and product configuration. In this tool paper, we introduce a new backbone extraction tool called CadiBack. It takes advantage of unique features available in our state-of-the-art SAT solver CaDiCaL including transparent inprocessing and single clause assumptions, which have not been evaluated in this context before. In addition, CaDiCaL is enhanced with an improved algorithm to support model rotation by utilizing watched literal data structures. In our comprehensive experiments with a large number of benchmarks, CadiBack solves 60% more instances than the state-of-the-art backbone extraction tool MiniBones. Our tool is thoroughly tested with fuzzing, internal correctness checking and cross-checking on a large benchmark set. It is publicly available as open source, well documented and easy to extend

Enumerating Disjoint Partial Models without Blocking Clauses

A basic algorithm for enumerating disjoint propositional models (disjoint AllSAT) is based on adding blocking clauses incrementally, ruling out previously found models. On the one hand, blocking clauses have the potential to reduce the number of generated models exponentially, as they can handle partial models. On the other hand, they need exponential space and slow down unit propagation. We propose a new approach that allows for enumerating disjoint partial models with no need for blocking clauses by integrating: Conflict-Driven Clause-Learning (CDCL), Chronological Backtracking (CB), and methods for shrinking models (Implicant Shrinking). Experiments clearly show the benefits of our novel approach

Progress in Certifying Hardware Model Checking Results

We present a formal framework to certify k-induction-based model checking results. The key idea is the notion of a k-witness circuit which simulates the given circuit and has a simple inductive invariant serving as proof certificate. Our approach allows to check proofs with an independent proof checker by reducing the certification problem to pure SAT checks and checking a simple QBF with one quantifier alternation. We also present Certifaiger, the resulting certification toolkit, and evaluate it on instances from the hardware model checking competition. Our experiments show the practical use of our certification method.Peer reviewe

Linear Encodings of Bounded LTL Model Checking

We consider the problem of bounded model checking (BMC) for linear temporal logic (LTL). We present several efficient encodings that have size linear in the bound. Furthermore, we show how the encodings can be extended to LTL with past operators (PLTL). The generalised encoding is still of linear size, but cannot detect minimal length counterexamples. By using the virtual unrolling technique minimal length counterexamples can be captured, however, the size of the encoding is quadratic in the specification. We also extend virtual unrolling to Buchi automata, enabling them to accept minimal length counterexamples. Our BMC encodings can be made incremental in order to benefit from incremental SAT technology. With fairly small modifications the incremental encoding can be further enhanced with a termination check, allowing us to prove properties with BMC. Experiments clearly show that our new encodings improve performance of BMC considerably, particularly in the case of the incremental encoding, and that they are very competitive for finding bugs. An analysis of the liveness-to-safety transformation reveals many similarities to the BMC encodings in this paper. Using the liveness-to-safety translation with BDD-based invariant checking results in an efficient method to find shortest counterexamples that complements the BMC-based approach.Comment: Final version for Logical Methods in Computer Science CAV 2005 special issu

Stratified Certification for k-Induction

Our recently proposed certification framework for bit-level k-induction-based model checking has been shown to be quite effective in increasing the trust of verification results even though it partially involved quantifier reasoning. In this paper we show how to simplify the approach by assuming reset functions to be stratified. This way it can be lifted to word-level and in principle to other theories where quantifier reasoning is difficult. Our new method requires six simple SAT checks and one polynomial-time check, allowing certification to remain in co-NP while the previous approach required five SAT checks and one QBF check. Experimental results show a substantial performance gain for our new approach. Finally we present and evaluate our new tool CERTIFAIGER-WL which is able to certify k-induction-based word-level model checking.Peer reviewe